Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-310, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 III was unveiled 6 years after the TG-310 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores versus the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-310

 E-M10 III TG-310 
AnnouncedAugust 2017January 2011More modern by 81 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 TG-310 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-310

 E-M10 III TG-310 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III features physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III against the TG-310.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and TG-310 is 80 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and TG-310.

Plainly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography info
73
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
33
resolution is good (14MP)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography features
Olympus TG-310 Street photography features
77
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch focus
good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography details
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography details
69
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
no phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography features
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography features
67
supports touch focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than competitors (155g)
weather proofing
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (150 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography details
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
39
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
32
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
heavier than competitors (410g)
32
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competitors (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus TG-310
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus TG-310
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2017-08-31 2011-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 155 grams (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 150 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $650 $0