Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was unveiled 5 years later than the VG-160 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 III scores versus the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 III VG-160 
ReleasedAugust 2017January 2012More recent by 69 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 VG-160 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 III VG-160 
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the VG-160.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and VG-160 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and VG-160.

Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography highlights
73
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
33
MP count good (14MP)
comes with face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Street photography highlights
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus via touch
good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competition (410g)
56
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography info
69
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
26
MP count good (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (165 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
67
includes focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
65
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery pack (165 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography advice
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
36
quite wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low battery pack (165 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging features
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
32
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
30
quite wide (26mm)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus VG-160
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus VG-160
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 7cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 pounds) 125g (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 165 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $650 $90