Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 5 years later than the VG-160 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 III scores versus the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VG-160
E-M10 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 69 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M10 III
VG-160 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-160
E-M10 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cc6d/8cc6da2a207f1fb37adc956dbccf4f7c180163e7" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and VG-160 is 80 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/840da/840daf16bff2948e226c92a4b35f9b4df0cfd7e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and VG-160.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71247/71247af9f7898388f93dc8992ef5c99c26d22014" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c626/0c626441c6d2380bc56d63cfd5841d7bbcbbc4ee" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 165 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $650 | $90 |