Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus VH-515 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 III was announced 5 years after the VH-515 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores vs the VH-515 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 III VH-515 
IntroducedAugust 2017August 2012Newer by 62 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kSharper screen (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 VH-515 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 III VH-515 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the VH-515.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and VH-515 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and VH-515.

As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography highlights
73
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
exports RAW formats
27
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography advice
Olympus VH-515 Street photography advice
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
includes touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competitors in class (410 grams)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
boasts focus via touch
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Olympus VH-515
69
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
32
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VH-515 as a Travel photography camera
67
includes touch to focus
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
more heavy than competitors in class (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
boasts focus via touch
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VH-515 as a Landscape photography camera
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
37
quite wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging details
32
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (410 grams)
35
quite wide (26mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus VH-515
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus VH-515
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2017-08-31 2012-08-21
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 pounds) 152 grams (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $650 $648