Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was announced 5 years after the VH-515 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores vs the VH-515 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus VH-515. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VH-515
E-M10 III | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | August 2012 | Newer by 62 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M10 III
VH-515 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515
E-M10 III | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VH-515 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the VH-515.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and VH-515 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and VH-515.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VH-515 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $650 | $648 |