Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 III was introduced 6 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M10 III matches up against the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M10 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 81 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+426k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
XZ-1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-1
E-M10 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III and the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1226/a1226aeda4b35b6cc5973a2c6909ab511f0cbf3e" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and XZ-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01745/01745ef8254efa3cd88f997675e4fc48197e1813" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and XZ-1.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c67/b6c6726d8bc2b54043f66bfabb6d225866606686" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5fff/a5ffff9f656a910a25c76337689e5cce4b5db7cd" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $650 | $567 |