Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is very close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 III was manufactured 5 months before the ZS200 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the ZS200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS200
E-M10 III | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
ZS200 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+200k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS200
E-M10 III | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2018 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III and the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/012ec/012ec8f37557c08fe6413663394c764d90ceaf29" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and ZS200 is 80 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3754/c37548ac718b4133e69b0209657ddbc0a24f07bd" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68e7f/68e7f3e4311c1332972a689c363f3495c094214e" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb01d/fb01d4531751d96001e51081aba4d5b2eb66ce94" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 340g (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $650 | $800 |