Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic FX75, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M10 III was announced 7 years after the FX75 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 III scores vs the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FX75

 E-M10 III FX75 
AnnouncedAugust 2017June 2010Newer by 89 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 FX75 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX75

 E-M10 III FX75 
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III and the FX75.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and FX75 is 80 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and FX75.

As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography info
73
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW files
28
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
has focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Sports photography camera
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
lack of phase detect AF
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography highlights
67
comes with touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
67
has focus by touch
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
37
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Panasonic FX75 Vlogging details
32
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than competition in class (410g)
31
decently wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Also called - Lumix DMC-FX70
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2010-06-01
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 7.40 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 165 grams (0.36 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $650 $139