Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was announced 5 years after the FZ200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 III FZ200 
LaunchedAugust 2017July 2012More modern by 63 months
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 FZ200 E-M10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 III FZ200 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the FZ200.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and FZ200 is 80 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and FZ200.

Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will produce more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography information
73
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
48
you can focus manually
above average flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography highlights
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
57
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect AF
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery power (540 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography information
67
comes with touch to focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
55
great battery power (540 CIPA)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
really wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
48
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (540 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ200
32
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic support
heavier than competition in class (410g)
63
really wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2017-08-31 2012-07-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 1,312k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 pounds) 588 grams (1.30 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 114
Other
Battery life 330 photos 540 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $650 $499