Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic GH4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 560g - 133 x 93 x 84mm
- Launched February 2014
- Previous Model is Panasonic GH3
- Renewed by Panasonic GH5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic GH4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the GH4 (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 III was brought out 3 years after the GH4 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M10 III grades vs the GH4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic GH4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic GH4
| E-M10 III | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2017 |  | February 2014 | Newer by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1036k | Crisper screen (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH4 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| GH4 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic GH4
| E-M10 III | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic GH4 has dimensions of 133mm x 93mm x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") having a weight of 560 grams (1.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic GH4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III vs the GH4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and GH4 is 80 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and GH4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures however you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Panasonic GH4
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
saves RAW formats
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography highlights
Panasonic GH4 Street photography highlights
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than average in class (410g)
screen articulates
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
has touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than others in class (560g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
Panasonic GH4 Sports photography factors
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Panasonic GH4 Travel photography details
offers touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
lighter than others in class (560g)
weather proof
has touch to focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography info
Panasonic GH4 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proof
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging information
Panasonic GH4 Vlogging information
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than average in class (410g)
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
offers face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone port
lighter than others in class (560g)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic GH4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,036k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.67x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 17.00 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, auto/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync/redeye reduction, forced off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 25p, 30p), 1920 x 1080 (24p, 25p, 30p, 50p, 60p), 1280 x 720 (24p, 25p, 30p), 640 x 480 (25p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 560 gr (1.23 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 133 x 93 x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 791 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 500 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DMW-BLF19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs (single or three-shot)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $650 | $1,500 |