Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 III was revealed 8 years later than the ZS1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up against the ZS1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS1
E-M10 III | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | May 2009 | More recent by 102 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
ZS1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1
E-M10 III | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS1 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the ZS1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and ZS1 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and ZS1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will give more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 229g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $650 | $0 |