Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
25
Overall
29

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic ZS1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
  • 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 III was revealed 8 years later than the ZS1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up against the ZS1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS1

 E-M10 III ZS1 
RevealedAugust 2017May 2009More recent by 102 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 ZS1 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1

 E-M10 III ZS1 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS1 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the ZS1.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and ZS1 is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and ZS1.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will give more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS1
73
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
25
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography info
Panasonic ZS1 Street photography info
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (229 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS1
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS1 as a Travel photography camera
67
boasts focus via touch
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than average in class (229g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZS1 Landscape photography advice
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
31
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS1 as a Vlogging camera
32
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic port
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
31
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (229g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS1
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-TZ6
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2017-08-31 2009-05-14
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-300mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 6.3
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 229g (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $650 $0