Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS20
- Updated by Panasonic ZS30
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS25, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the ZS25 (16MP) is very close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was revealed 4 years after the ZS25 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the ZS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS25
| E-M10 III | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2017 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| ZS25 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS25
| E-M10 III | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS25 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III against the ZS25.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and ZS25 is 80 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and ZS25.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III uses the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The newer E-M10 III will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography features
Panasonic ZS25 Portrait photography features
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
MP count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Panasonic ZS25 Street photography details
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography information
Panasonic ZS25 Sports photography information
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,200s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (260 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS25
offers focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than competitors (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
comes with touch focus
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low battery (260 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
low battery (260 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging info
Panasonic ZS25 Vlogging info
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 260 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $650 | $300 |