Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic ZS45
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS40
- New Model is Panasonic ZS50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS45, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the ZS45 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 III was manufactured 2 years later than the ZS45 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III grades vs the ZS45 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS45
| E-M10 III | ZS45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2017 |  | January 2015 | More recent by 33 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| ZS45 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS45
| E-M10 III | ZS45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1040k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS45 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS45 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the ZS45.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and ZS45 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and ZS45.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 III provides the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The younger E-M10 III is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZS45 Portrait photography factors
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW files
good megapixels (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography factors
Panasonic ZS45 Street photography factors
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
offers focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition (410g)
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (249g)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS45 as a Sports photography camera
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
no phase detect AF
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
good battery (350 shots)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
Panasonic ZS45 Travel photography information
offers focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition (410 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
good battery (350 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (249g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Panasonic ZS45 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS45
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focusing
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of mic socket
heavier than competition (410 grams)
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (249g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-08-31 | 2015-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $650 | $300 |
