Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic ZS50, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was revealed 2 years after the ZS50 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the ZS50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS50
E-M10 III | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | January 2015 | Newer by 33 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-M10 III
ZS50 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS50
E-M10 III | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic ZS50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III and the ZS50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and ZS50 is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and ZS50.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $350 |