Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Succeeded the Pentax 645D
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 645Z (Medium format) provide different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was introduced 3 years later than the 645Z and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M10 III scores versus the 645Z in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax 645Z. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax 645Z
E-M10 III | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | April 2014 | More recent by 42 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer display (+3k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus E-M10 III
645Z | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax 645Z
E-M10 III | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Pentax 645Z has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") having a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the 645Z.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and 645Z is 80 and 49 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The graphic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and 645Z.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Pentax 645Z will offer extra detail using its extra 35MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax 645Z |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro DSLR |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2014-04-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 8256 x 6192 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 6 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/125 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 1550 gr (3.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 101 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 650 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Launch price | $650 | $5,024 |