Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Introduced June 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax Efina, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the Efina (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and Efina (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was brought out 4 years later than the Efina and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the Efina with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax Efina. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax Efina
E-M10 III | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | June 2013 | Fresher by 52 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus E-M10 III
Efina | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax Efina
E-M10 III | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax Efina has proportions of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III against the Efina.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and Efina is 80 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and Efina.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Efina Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Efina | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Efina |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2013-06-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 20cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 91 gr (0.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 200 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $650 | $10 |