Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
60 Imaging
58 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Announced June 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax K-5
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-5 II, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the K-5 II (16MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and K-5 II (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was launched 4 years later than the K-5 II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 III scores against the K-5 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax K-5 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax K-5 II
E-M10 III | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | June 2013 | Fresher by 52 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Sharper display (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
K-5 II | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-5 II
E-M10 III | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-5 II has measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") having a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-5 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the K-5 II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and K-5 II is 80 and 60 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The visual here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and K-5 II.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III has the smaller sensor which is going to make getting bokeh more challenging. The fresher E-M10 III should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-5 II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2013-06-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lb) | 760 grams (1.68 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1235 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 980 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $650 | $830 |