Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 III was introduced 3 years later than the K-500 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M10 III matches up against the K-500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax K-500
E-M10 III | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 46 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-M10 III
K-500 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-500
E-M10 III | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Pentax K-500 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III against the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ea1/b9ea155dcab557a8bc260e4c878c2617f8bf9676" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and K-500 is 80 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/080d7/080d77eb91056cf1532c9c95cdd1f5231518b387" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and K-500.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III offers the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult. The younger E-M10 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26d4f/26d4fdc2a7ab201e478a121560b11d53d47ce3d2" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29966/299660b4039de651535f11162857ffb5c79e0952" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-500 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 646 gr (1.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 710 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $650 | $600 |