Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f5c/17f5cd4f03c94030eab99c5ab77b6a4371e5b9be" alt="Pentax K-S2 front Pentax K-S2 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Pentax K-S1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the K-S2 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and K-S2 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 III was announced 2 years later than the K-S2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M10 III grades against the K-S2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Pentax K-S2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax K-S2
E-M10 III | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 32 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus E-M10 III
K-S2 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-S2
E-M10 III | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Pentax K-S2 has measurements of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the K-S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10644/10644f5a1f32c3ce98cbd53635945c847e02c79b" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and K-S2 is 80 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d853/5d853c13c1f12e4060f398b22634bf8a6b8cc1d0" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and K-S2.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Pentax K-S2 will provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82fe8/82fe8e7d57c9d56b714edc3cc980a11c282816de" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1289/b1289be3ba5cdc9c9b7102258c428cb0d1e5a73f" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-S2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 5.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 678 gr (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 410 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $650 | $581 |