Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Introduced March 2011
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-r, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and K-r (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 III was launched 6 years later than the K-r and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 III grades vs the K-r with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax K-r. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax K-r
E-M10 III | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | March 2011 | More recent by 79 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-M10 III
K-r | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-r
E-M10 III | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-r has dimensions of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax K-r in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the K-r.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and K-r is 80 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and K-r.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax K-r |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 598g (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 470 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $650 | $1,100 |