Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1de/ce1defc693d186d489caa9ba163f0305eaf354f0" alt="Pentax Optio RS1500 front Pentax Optio RS1500 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax RS1500, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the RS1500 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RS1500 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 III was revealed 6 years later than the RS1500 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RS1500 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M10 III scores against the RS1500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Pentax Optio RS1500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax RS1500
E-M10 III | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | March 2011 | Fresher by 79 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus E-M10 III
RS1500 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax RS1500
E-M10 III | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Pentax RS1500 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax RS1500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III and the RS1500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a32e3/a32e3e0605350580ade96904ce2ea813fcf801fd" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and RS1500 is 80 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d25b/2d25b51ea435206b6fc189eb9450e1bf7a83a941" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and RS1500.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/078c9/078c9496153d53138f97149702c1b7209cefb476" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3874/c38748125df6a726f62747e83ec5d2b5df3954f2" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2011-03-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 157 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 260 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $150 |