Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 III was revealed 6 years later than the WG-1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the WG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Pentax Optio WG-1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax WG-1
E-M10 III | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 80 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
WG-1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax WG-1
E-M10 III | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III provides external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the WG-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2913c/2913ccdb84e79897dfc89c5f60a379160a4d7292" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and WG-1 is 80 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1449/b1449c68e62f8d4999976a295f77dec3a5417c02" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and WG-1.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will show extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dff2/5dff29574af4d4f0b0d95686e7c186635a106ea3" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/345ed/345ed95895ed9b18fa27698cd162297bac88d897" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 157 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $650 | $350 |