Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Pentax Optio WG-1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Pentax WG-1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 III was revealed 6 years later than the WG-1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the WG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax WG-1

 E-M10 III WG-1 
IntroducedAugust 2017February 2011More recent by 80 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 WG-1 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax WG-1

 E-M10 III WG-1 
Manually focus More precise focus
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III provides external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the WG-1.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and WG-1 is 80 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and WG-1.

All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will show extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Pentax WG-1
73
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW files
35
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Pentax WG-1 Street photography details
77
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (410g)
54
environment proofing
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
Pentax WG-1 Sports photography factors
69
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
has no phase detect AF
37
good megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Pentax WG-1
67
boasts focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
more heavy than competition (410g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
environment proofing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography advice
Pentax WG-1 Landscape photography advice
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
42
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good megapixels (14MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging information
Pentax WG-1 Vlogging information
32
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
25
relatively wide (28mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax WG-1
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIPentax Optio WG-1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Pentax Optio WG-1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2017-08-31 2011-02-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lbs) 157 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 260 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $650 $350