Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 III was brought out 3 years after the Q-S1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the Q-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax Q-S1
E-M10 III | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | August 2014 | Newer by 38 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
Q-S1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax Q-S1
E-M10 III | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III and the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f487/9f4871bd39f618d4f84131a7f75177a969fd5160" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and Q-S1 is 80 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8af4e/8af4e72cadd64b4d2e9172857be850d148690fca" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and Q-S1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28fce/28fcebca5afc48df46fe9a3d20336933b58ae2e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91bbc/91bbc9c5a6bf0ef5d97926e11b4a9ac72f8836a5" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 250 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $650 | $250 |