Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Previous Model is Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax Q7, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and Q7 (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years after the Q7 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M10 III grades versus the Q7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Pentax Q7. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax Q7
E-M10 III | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | August 2013 | Newer by 50 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus E-M10 III
Q7 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax Q7
E-M10 III | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax Q7 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3f39/a3f396d4df6b237fc45aa6b99c36e9719a7eb58e" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and Q7 is 80 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67609/676094d61ba9bd84d6f0bc1fd9ed83fd709a03da" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The pic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and Q7.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5609e/5609ef36b2134d4cde1ee7d919abc53510dcae1b" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd20/ccd2031ae396586e18bc9b167c75d57100eb8206" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax Q7 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2013-08-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 250 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $650 | $480 |