Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 III was manufactured 7 years later than the CX4 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the CX4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Ricoh CX4

 E-M10 III CX4 
AnnouncedAugust 2017August 2010More recent by 86 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kClearer display (+120k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 CX4 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Ricoh CX4

 E-M10 III CX4 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III against the CX4.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and CX4 is 80 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and CX4.

As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography details
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography details
73
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
26
has manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
77
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
provides touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than average in class (410g)
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Ricoh CX4
69
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
67
provides touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than average in class (410g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
66
lighter than competition (205g)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Landscape photography camera
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
42
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
32
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
30
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIRicoh CX4
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Ricoh CX4
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2017-08-31 2010-08-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lbs) 205 gr (0.45 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $650 $211