Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80
80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and CL80 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was launched 7 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung CL80
| E-M10 III | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2017 | January 2010 | More recent by 94 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| CL80 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung CL80
| E-M10 III | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the CL80.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and CL80 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and CL80.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung CL80 |
| Alternate name | - | ST5500 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $650 | $400 |