Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Refreshed by Samsung NX1100
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX1000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX1000 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX1000 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was announced 5 years later than the NX1000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III grades against the NX1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Samsung NX1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX1000
E-M10 III | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | April 2012 | More recent by 66 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX1000 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX1000
E-M10 III | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1000 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX1000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the NX1000.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and NX1000 is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and NX1000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX1000 will give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX1000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2012-04-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 320 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $388 |