Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX210

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

The E-M10 III was manufactured 5 years later than the NX200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the NX200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX200
E-M10 III | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 68 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+426k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX200 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX200
E-M10 III | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the NX200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and NX200 is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and NX200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX200 will show greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 223 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $650 | $818 |