Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Replacement is Samsung NX3000
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years after the NX2000 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the NX2000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Samsung NX2000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX2000
E-M10 III | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | November 2013 | More modern by 46 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX2000 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 1040k | Crisper display (+112k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000
E-M10 III | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III vs the NX2000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and NX2000 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and NX2000.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX2000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lb) | 228g (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $650 | $599 |