Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Samsung NX2000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
63
Features
68
Overall
65

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung NX2000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
  • Launched November 2013
  • Old Model is Samsung NX1100
  • Replacement is Samsung NX3000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Overview

In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years after the NX2000 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the NX2000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX2000

 E-M10 III NX2000 
LaunchedAugust 2017November 2013More modern by 46 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 NX2000 E-M10 III 
Display sizing3.7"3"Larger display (+0.7")
Display resolution1152k1040kCrisper display (+112k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000

 E-M10 III NX2000 
Focus manually More precise focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III vs the NX2000.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and NX2000 is 80 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and NX2000.

As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX2000 Portrait photography factors
73
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
77
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX2000 as a Street photography camera
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410g)
77
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
comes with touch to focus
lighter than competition (228 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
Samsung NX2000 Sports photography factors
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
61
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Samsung NX2000 Travel photography details
67
features focus by touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than competition in class (410g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
72
lighter than competition (228g)
comes with touch to focus
good megapixels (20MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX2000 as a Landscape photography camera
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
lovely big screen (3.7 inches)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Samsung NX2000
32
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
35
touchscreen enabled
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (228 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX2000
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISamsung NX2000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Samsung NX2000
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2017-08-31 2013-11-30
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 21
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Amount of lenses 107 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3.7 inches
Display resolution 1,040k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 lb) 228g (0.50 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 75
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 908
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 340 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $650 $599