Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX2000
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was introduced 3 years later than the NX3000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the NX3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Samsung NX3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX3000
E-M10 III | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | May 2014 | Fresher by 40 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 461k | Clearer display (+579k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX3000 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX3000
E-M10 III | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has dimensions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the NX3000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and NX3000 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and NX3000.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX3000 will deliver extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $650 | $897 |