Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
87 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Samsung NX300
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX500 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was announced 2 years later than the NX500 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III grades against the NX500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung NX500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX500
E-M10 III | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | February 2015 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1036k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX500 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX500
E-M10 III | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III features external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung NX500 has measurements of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III vs the NX500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and NX500 is 80 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and NX500.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Samsung NX500 will deliver more detail with its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX500 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.265 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 287g (0.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $650 | $800 |