Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
69 Imaging
71 Features
84 Overall
76
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 599g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Launched November 2014
- Succeeded the Sony A7
- Renewed by Sony A7 III
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A7 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A7 II (24MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A7 II (Full frame) posses different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was manufactured 2 years after the A7 II which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 III scores vs the A7 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Alpha A7 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony A7 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A7 II
E-M10 III | A7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | November 2014 | Newer by 34 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A7 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
A7 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1040k | Clearer display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A7 II
E-M10 III | A7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony A7 II has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") along with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A7 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the A7 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and A7 II is 80 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and A7 II.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A7 II will offer you greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A7 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A7 II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2014-11-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 599 grams (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 90 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2449 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $650 | $1,456 |