Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
62 Imaging
81 Features
93 Overall
85
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
- Revealed July 2019
- Superseded the Sony A7R III
- Replacement is Sony A7R V
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A7R IV (61MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A7R IV (Full frame) use totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was unveiled 22 months before the A7R IV which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 III grades versus the A7R IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Alpha A7R IV. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony A7R IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A7R IV
E-M10 III | A7R IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R IV over the Olympus E-M10 III
A7R IV | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2019 | August 2017 | More modern by 22 months | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 1040k | Crisper screen (+400k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A7R IV
E-M10 III | A7R IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony A7R IV has dimensions of 129mm x 96mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") along with a weight of 665 grams (1.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III vs the A7R IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and A7R IV is 80 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and A7R IV.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A7R IV will result in more detail having an extra 45 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 III will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A7R IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A7R IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A7R IV |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2019-07-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 61 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 9504 x 6336 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 567 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lb) | 665 grams (1.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 99 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3344 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 670 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 2 |
Pricing at release | $650 | $3,498 |