Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40981/40981ccf87e517ab85013e07ab90b65a61cd2565" alt="Sony Alpha A99 II front Sony Alpha A99 II front"
57 Imaging
76 Features
92 Overall
82
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A99 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 12 months after the A99 II and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the A99 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Alpha A99 II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A99 II
E-M10 III | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 12 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
A99 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A99 II
E-M10 III | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A99 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III vs the A99 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8f6c/e8f6c8950a636ed71071d962bcb5296d3bbf7c3f" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and A99 II is 80 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12d77/12d7798aea015d0e7c628aa04136ec9552044491" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and A99 II.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony A99 II will give you greater detail having an extra 26MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0415d/0415d21bf49034e8fd377032e9b7abf2868fa9d8" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e6cd/6e6cd2e17fdb84b27261c0b7466754b17ecffaaf" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lb) | 849 grams (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 490 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | 1 | 2 |
Cost at release | $650 | $3,198 |