Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was announced 9 years later than the A200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M10 III grades versus the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A200
E-M10 III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | July 2008 | More recent by 112 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
A200 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A200
E-M10 III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III and the A200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and A200 is 80 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and A200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $650 | $100 |