Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced January 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A300, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 III was released 9 years later than the A300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 III grades vs the A300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A300

 E-M10 III A300 
IntroducedAugust 2017January 2008More recent by 117 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 A300 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A300

 E-M10 III A300 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony A300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the A300.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and A300 is 80 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and A300.

Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Sony A300 Portrait photography information
73
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography info
Sony A300 Street photography info
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
74
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Sony A300 Sports photography info
69
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
Sony A300 Travel photography information
67
includes touch to focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
45
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography advice
Sony A300 Landscape photography advice
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
57
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Sony A300 Vlogging details
32
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
9
can't shoot video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A300
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2017-08-31 2008-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Max video resolution 3840x2160 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lbs) 632 gr (1.39 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 330 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Launch price $650 $0