Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched May 2009
- Replaced the Sony A300
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A330, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A330 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was introduced 8 years later than the A330 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the A330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A330
E-M10 III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | May 2009 | More recent by 101 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-M10 III
A330 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A330
E-M10 III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony A330 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III against the A330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and A330 is 80 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The visual below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and A330.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 529g (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 230 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $650 | $545 |