Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
- Later Model is Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 III was launched 4 years later than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 III scores against the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony NEX-3N
E-M10 III | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2013 | More recent by 55 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-M10 III
NEX-3N | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony NEX-3N
E-M10 III | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III vs the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11597/115974d8ac6770ba313abbc1691e04ed6719ff8c" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and NEX-3N is 80 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7bd3/c7bd3681304c438782209a1dec5bd78ee5599a41" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 III uses the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging. The more modern E-M10 III is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01893/01893a3b72e49917cca46b6798aae97d90670ae6" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d58fd/d58fdaa0f1ad7874697fe2e62f42d810ac7001b3" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 480 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $650 | $399 |