Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Older Model is Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony a3500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and a3500 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 III was launched 3 years later than the a3500 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III grades against the a3500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony a3500
E-M10 III | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | March 2014 | Fresher by 42 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Olympus E-M10 III
a3500 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony a3500
E-M10 III | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony a3500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III against the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93e05/93e0517cb67cb61825f41ea12d3845be46f947fb" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and a3500 is 80 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74397/743974122ec2396723a78c7de93a561b5177c3e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and a3500.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony a3500 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f620/1f620153e26e347f960df0be103e074125bcf8fe" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11a2/f11a2b8a5103a3a9d75f627ab1f5303398bc0673" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2014-03-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 411g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 470 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $650 | $398 |