Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6000
- Renewed by Sony A6500
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was released 20 months after the A6300 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M10 III grades versus the A6300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A6300
E-M10 III | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | February 2016 | More modern by 20 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Sharper display (+118k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-M10 III
A6300 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A6300
E-M10 III | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III vs the A6300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and A6300 is 80 and 83 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and A6300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A6300 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 404 grams (0.89 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $650 | $889 |