Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
45
Features
31
Overall
39

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony H200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony H200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the H200 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the H200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony H200

 E-M10 III H200 
RevealedAugust 2017January 2013More recent by 57 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 H200 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony H200

 E-M10 III H200 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony H200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III against the H200.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and H200 is 80 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and H200.

All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony H200 will show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Sony H200 Portrait photography info
73
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW files
38
good megapixels (20MP)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography info
Sony H200 Street photography info
77
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than average (410g)
45
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (530 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony H200 as a Sports photography camera
69
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
47
incredible zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Sony H200 Travel photography advice
67
includes focus via touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
more heavy than average (410 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
53
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (633mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
more heavy than competition in class (530 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H200 as a Landscape photography camera
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
41
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony H200 as a Vlogging camera
32
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than average (410g)
25
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (530 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony H200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony H200
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2017-08-31 2013-01-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 2920
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-633mm (26.4x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 20cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - ClearPhoto LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 6.80 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lb) 530 grams (1.17 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 240 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack AA
Battery ID BLS-50 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $650 $250