Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
90 Imaging
42 Features
50 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 254g - 107 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX10V
- Successor is Sony HX30V
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX20V, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the HX20V (18MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and HX20V (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was revealed 5 years after the HX20V which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX20V being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the HX20V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony HX20V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony HX20V
E-M10 III | HX20V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | July 2012 | More modern by 63 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer display (+118k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX20V over the Olympus E-M10 III
HX20V | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX20V
E-M10 III | HX20V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III features external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony HX20V has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 254 grams (0.56 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX20V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III and the HX20V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and HX20V is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and HX20V.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Sony HX20V will result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX20V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-07-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 254 gr (0.56 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 107 x 62 x 35mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 320 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $650 | $397 |