Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony QX10
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1440 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the QX10 (18MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and QX10 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 III was launched 4 years after the QX10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 III grades vs the QX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony QX10

 E-M10 III QX10 
RevealedAugust 2017September 2013Newer by 49 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution1040k0kSharper display (+1040k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 QX10 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX10

 E-M10 III QX10 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has sizing of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III against the QX10.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and QX10 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and QX10.

Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony QX10 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Sony QX10 Portrait photography info
73
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
36
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Sony QX10
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410g)
68
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
lighter than others in class (105g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
Sony QX10 Sports photography factors
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
37
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX10 as a Travel photography camera
67
features touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than others in class (105g)
comes with focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography info
Sony QX10 Landscape photography info
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
38
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
small screen ( inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
not so great battery power (220 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Sony QX10
32
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors (410g)
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (105 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1440 x 1080 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX10
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Lens-style
Announced 2017-08-31 2013-09-04
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch -
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - Depends on connected smartphone
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off None
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1440 x 1080 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1440x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lb) 105 grams (0.23 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 220 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $650 $250