Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 front
Portability
92
Imaging
51
Features
44
Overall
48

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony QX100
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 160 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
  • Announced September 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and QX100 (1") posses different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 III was announced 4 years later than the QX100 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the QX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony QX100

 E-M10 III QX100 
AnnouncedAugust 2017September 2013Fresher by 49 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution1040k0kCrisper display (+1040k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 QX100 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX100

 E-M10 III QX100 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has sizing of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III versus the QX100.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and QX100 is 80 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and QX100.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony QX100 will show extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Sony QX100 Portrait photography information
73
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
53
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports face detect focusing
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Sony QX100 Street photography details
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
71
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
boasts touch focus
no articulating screen
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Sony QX100
69
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
55
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
terrible battery (200 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX100 as a Travel photography camera
67
boasts focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
more heavy than average in class (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
boasts touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
pretty wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse recording
terrible battery (200 shots)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Sony QX100 Landscape photography details
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
54
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
tiny screen (")
manual exposure not possible
lacks RAW format
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Sony QX100
32
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone socket
more heavy than average in class (410g)
38
pretty wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony QX100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony QX100
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Lens-style
Announced 2017-08-31 2013-09-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 160
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-100mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture - f/1.8-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" -
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - Depends on connected smartphone
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off None
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 179 grams (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 200 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $650 $268