Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front
Portability
79
Imaging
70
Features
57
Overall
64

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony RX1
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
  • 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
  • Revealed February 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) have totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 III was introduced 4 years later than the RX1 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III scores against the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX1

 E-M10 III RX1 
RevealedAugust 2017February 2013More recent by 56 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 RX1 E-M10 III 
Display resolution1229k1040kClearer display (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1

 E-M10 III RX1 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III against the RX1.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and RX1 is 80 and 79 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and RX1.

All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX1 will give extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Sony RX1 Portrait photography information
73
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
82
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
megapixel count good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Sony RX1
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides focus by touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (410 grams)
66
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
great ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (482 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1 as a Sports photography camera
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
lacks phase detect auto focus
53
megapixel count good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
comes with tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (35mm)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (270 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX1 as a Travel photography camera
67
provides focus by touch
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than competition in class (410g)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
megapixel count good (24MP)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery (270 CIPA)
more heavy than competitors in class (482 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography information
Sony RX1 Landscape photography information
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
65
has manual focus
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3")
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (270 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX1 as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (410 grams)
34
great max aperture (f2.0)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external microphone support
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (482g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2017-08-31 2013-02-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 35.8 x 23.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 852.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-22.0
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - Xtra FineTFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic and Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 482 gr (1.06 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 93
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.3
DXO Low light score not tested 2534
Other
Battery life 330 images 270 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $650 $2,798