Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX10 IV (1") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was revealed around the same time to the RX10 IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III grades vs the RX10 IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX10 IV
E-M10 III | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus E-M10 III
RX10 IV | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1440k | 1040k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX10 IV
E-M10 III | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | September 2017 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the RX10 IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and RX10 IV is 80 and 52 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and RX10 IV.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony RX10 IV will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 1095 grams (2.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 400 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $650 | $1,698 |