Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II front
Portability
89
Imaging
51
Features
74
Overall
60

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony RX100 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
  • Introduced June 2013
  • Replaced the Sony RX100
  • Refreshed by Sony RX100 III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony RX100 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the RX100 II (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX100 II (1") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 III was unveiled 4 years after the RX100 II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M10 III scores versus the RX100 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX100 II

 E-M10 III RX100 II 
IntroducedAugust 2017June 2013Newer by 51 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Olympus E-M10 III

 RX100 II E-M10 III 
Screen resolution1229k1040kCrisper screen (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX100 II

 E-M10 III RX100 II 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony RX100 II has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony RX100 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the RX100 II.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and RX100 II is 80 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The pic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and RX100 II.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony RX100 II will produce greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Sony RX100 II
73
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
70
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography factors
Sony RX100 II Street photography factors
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
85
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW files
lighter than others (281g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX100 II as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect auto focus
67
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
includes tracking autofocus
great battery power (350 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography features
Sony RX100 II Travel photography features
67
includes touch to focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
display is not selfie friendly
80
great battery power (350 CIPA)
lighter than others (281 grams)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony RX100 II
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
74
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW files
great battery power (350 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging highlights
Sony RX100 II Vlogging highlights
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
37
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (281g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX100 II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2017-08-31 2013-06-27
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 160
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-100mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-4.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W))
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs 1/2000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 281 gr (0.62 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 67
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.4
DXO Low light score not tested 483
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 350 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots))
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $650 $598