Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Updated by Sony RX1R II
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX1R (Full frame) offer different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was introduced 4 years later than the RX1R and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III grades versus the RX1R in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX1R
E-M10 III | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | June 2013 | More recent by 51 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus E-M10 III
RX1R | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1R
E-M10 III | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony RX1R has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III against the RX1R.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and RX1R is 80 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and RX1R.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX1R will render greater detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2013-06-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 482 gr (1.06 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 270 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $650 | $2,798 |