Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Launched October 2015
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX1R
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 III was launched 23 months later than the RX1R II which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the RX1R II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 III RX1R II 
LaunchedAugust 2017October 2015More recent by 23 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-M10 III

 RX1R II E-M10 III 
Screen resolution1229k1040kClearer screen (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 III RX1R II 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the RX1R II.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and RX1R II is 80 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and RX1R II.

As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 26 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography features
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography features
73
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW files
85
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
great MP (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Sony RX1R II
77
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
supports touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
73
tilting screen
sensor size is great (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
great ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average (507g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Sports photography camera
69
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
no phase detect AF
63
great MP (42MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
features tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
can't change focal length (35mm)
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Sony RX1R II Travel photography details
67
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than competition in class (410g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
great MP (42 megapixels)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery life (220 shots)
more heavy than average (507g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography advice
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography advice
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
68
you can focus manually
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
great MP (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging highlights
Sony RX1R II Vlogging highlights
32
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
34
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external microphone support
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average (507 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2015-10-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 42MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 200 50
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus range - 14cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 pounds) 507 gr (1.12 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 97
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.9
DXO Low light score not tested 3204
Other
Battery life 330 shots 220 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $650 $3,300