Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Overview

Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 III was brought out 7 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony S2000

 E-M10 III S2000 
LaunchedAugust 2017January 2010Fresher by 94 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 S2000 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony S2000

 E-M10 III S2000 
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the S2000.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and S2000 is 80 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and S2000.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will render more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Sony S2000 Portrait photography factors
73
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
19
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography information
Sony S2000 Street photography information
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
46
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Sports photography camera
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,200s)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
Sony S2000 Travel photography information
67
includes focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
50
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low resolution (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography info
Sony S2000 Landscape photography info
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
27
screen size is good (3 inch)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
Sony S2000 Vlogging advice
32
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
21
wide angle not the best (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony S2000
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-08-31 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1200 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 167 grams (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $650 $225