Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Released February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 III was launched 8 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M10 III scores vs the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony T900

 E-M10 III T900 
ReleasedAugust 2017February 2009Newer by 104 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k922kSharper display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 T900 E-M10 III 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony T900

 E-M10 III T900 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III vs the T900.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and T900 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and T900.

As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Sony T900 Portrait photography factors
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
27
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Sony T900
77
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features focus via touch
good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (410g)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography features
Sony T900 Sports photography features
69
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect AF
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Sony T900 Travel photography advice
67
features focus via touch
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Sony T900 Landscape photography details
80
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
36
you can focus manually
very good size screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging features
Sony T900 Vlogging features
32
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
28
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony T900
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2017-08-31 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3.5"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 143 grams (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $650 $300