Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
94 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
94 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony TF1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.6-4.7) lens
- 152g - 102 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched June 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TF1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TF1 (16MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TF1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was introduced 4 years later than the TF1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TF1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the TF1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony TF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony TF1
| E-M10 III | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2017 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 52 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TF1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| TF1 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TF1
| E-M10 III | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony TF1 has sizing of 102mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TF1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III against the TF1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TF1 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and TF1.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III includes the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The younger E-M10 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Sony TF1 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography highlights
Sony TF1 Street photography highlights
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
has focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than average (410 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (152g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Sony TF1
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony TF1 as a Travel photography camera
has focus via touch
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
heavier than average (410g)
display is not selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (152g)
weather proofing
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony TF1 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Sony TF1
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than average (410 grams)
quite wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (152 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TF1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.6-4.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 62 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $650 | $266 |